2016-09-05 06:19:19 +00:00
|
|
|
% Tutorial on time delay and signal integrity for radar
|
|
|
|
% and UWB applications
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% Tested with
|
|
|
|
% - Octave 4.0
|
|
|
|
% - openEMS v0.0.35
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% Author: Georg Michel, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clear;
|
|
|
|
close all;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
physical_constants;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% --- start of configuration section ---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% In radar and ultrawideband applications it is important to know the
|
|
|
|
% delay and fidelity of RF pulses. The delay is the retardation of the
|
|
|
|
% signal from the source to the phase center of the antenna. It is
|
|
|
|
% composed out of linear delay, dispersion and minimum-phase
|
|
|
|
% delay. Dispersion due to waveguides or frequency-dependent
|
|
|
|
% permittivity and minimum-phase delay due to resonances will degrade
|
|
|
|
% the fidelity which is the normalized similarity between excitation and
|
|
|
|
% radiated signal. In this tutorial you can examine the performance of a
|
|
|
|
% simple ultrawideband (UWB) monopole. The delay and fidelity of this
|
|
|
|
% antenna are calculated and plotted. You can compare these properties
|
|
|
|
% in different channels.
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% The Gaussian excitation is set to the same 3dB bandwidth as the
|
2022-03-11 21:17:27 +00:00
|
|
|
% channels of the IEEE 802.15.4 UWB PHY. One exception is channel4twice
|
2016-09-05 06:19:19 +00:00
|
|
|
% which has the double bandwidth of channel 4. It can be seen that the
|
|
|
|
% delay is larger and the fidelity is smaller in the vicinity of the
|
|
|
|
% (undesired) resonances of the antenna. Note that for a real UWB system
|
|
|
|
% the total delay and fidelity result from both the transmitting and
|
|
|
|
% receiving antenna or twice the delay and the square of the fidelity
|
|
|
|
% for monostatic radar.
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% The resolution of the delay will depend on the 'Oversampling'
|
|
|
|
% parameter to InitFDTD. See the description of DelayFidelity
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% In the configuration section below you can uncomment the respective
|
|
|
|
% parameter settings. As an exercise, you can examine how the permittivity
|
|
|
|
% of the substrate influences gain, delay and fidelity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%suffix = "channel1";
|
|
|
|
%f_0 = 3.5e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
%f_c = 0.25e9 / 0.3925; % 3dB bandwidth is 0.3925 times 20dB bandwidth for Gaussian excitation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%suffix = "channel2";
|
|
|
|
%f_0 = 4.0e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
%f_c = 0.25e9 / 0.3925;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%suffix = "channel3";
|
|
|
|
%f_0 = 4.5e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
%f_c = 0.25e9 / 0.3925;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
suffix = "channel4";
|
|
|
|
f_0 = 4.0e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
f_c = 0.5e9 / 0.3925;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%suffix = "channel5";
|
|
|
|
%f_0 = 6.5e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
%f_c = 0.25e9 / 0.3925;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%suffix = "channel7";
|
|
|
|
%f_0 = 6.5e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
%f_c = 0.5e9 / 0.3925;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%suffix = "channel4twice"; % this is just to demonstrate the degradation of the fidelity with increasing bandwidth
|
|
|
|
%f_0 = 4.0e9; % center frequency of the channel
|
|
|
|
%f_c = 1e9 / 0.3925;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tilt = 45 * pi / 180; % polarization tilt angle against co-polarization (90DEG is cross polarized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% --- end of configuration section ---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% path and filename setup
|
|
|
|
Sim_Path = 'tmp';
|
|
|
|
Sim_CSX = 'uwb.xml';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% properties of the substrate
|
|
|
|
substrate.epsR = 4; % FR4
|
|
|
|
substrate.height = 0.707;
|
|
|
|
substrate.cells = 3; % thickness in cells
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% size of the monopole and the gap to the ground plane
|
|
|
|
gap = 0.62; % 0.5
|
|
|
|
patchsize = 14;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% we will use millimeters
|
|
|
|
unit = 1e-3;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% set the resolution for the finer structures, e.g. the antenna gap
|
|
|
|
fineResolution = C0 / (f_0 + f_c) / sqrt(substrate.epsR) / unit / 40;
|
|
|
|
% set the resolution for the coarser structures, e.g. the surrounding air
|
|
|
|
coarseResolution = C0/(f_0 + f_c) / unit / 20;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% initialize the CSX structure
|
|
|
|
CSX = InitCSX();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% add the properties which are used to model the antenna
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddMetal(CSX, 'Ground' );
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddMetal(CSX, 'Patch');
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddMetal(CSX, 'Line');
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddMaterial(CSX, 'Substrate' );
|
|
|
|
CSX = SetMaterialProperty(CSX, 'Substrate', 'Epsilon', substrate.epsR);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% define the supstrate and sheet-like primitives for the properties
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddBox(CSX, 'Substrate', 1, [-16, -16, -substrate.height], [16, 18, 0]);
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddBox(CSX, 'Ground', 2, [-16, -16, -substrate.height], [16, 0, -substrate.height]);
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddBox(CSX, 'Line', 2, [-1.15, -16, 0], [1.15, gap, 0]);
|
|
|
|
CSX = AddBox(CSX, 'Patch', 2, [-patchsize/2, gap, 0], [patchsize/2, gap + patchsize, 0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% setup a mesh
|
|
|
|
mesh.x = [];
|
|
|
|
mesh.y = [];
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-11 21:17:27 +00:00
|
|
|
% two mesh lines for the metal coatings of the substrate
|
2016-09-05 06:19:19 +00:00
|
|
|
mesh.z = linspace(-substrate.height, 0, substrate.cells +1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% find optimal mesh lines for the patch and ground, not yes the microstrip line
|
|
|
|
mesh = DetectEdges(CSX, mesh, 'SetProperty',{'Patch', 'Ground'}, '2D_Metal_Edge_Res', fineResolution/2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%replace gap mesh lines which are too close by a single mesh line
|
|
|
|
tooclose = find (diff(mesh.y) < fineResolution/4);
|
|
|
|
if ~isempty(tooclose)
|
|
|
|
mesh.y(tooclose) = (mesh.y(tooclose) + mesh.y(tooclose+1))/2;
|
|
|
|
mesh.y(tooclose + 1) = [];
|
|
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% store the microstrip edges in a temporary variable
|
|
|
|
meshline = DetectEdges(CSX, [], 'SetProperty', 'Line', '2D_Metal_Edge_Res', fineResolution/2);
|
|
|
|
% as well as the edges of the substrate (without 1/3 - 2/3 rule)
|
|
|
|
meshsubstrate = DetectEdges(CSX, [], 'SetProperty', 'Substrate');
|
|
|
|
% add only the x mesh lines of the microstrip
|
|
|
|
mesh.x = [mesh.x meshline.x];
|
|
|
|
% and only the top of the substrate, the other edges are covered by the ground plane
|
|
|
|
mesh.y = [mesh.y, meshsubstrate.y(end)]; % top of substrate
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-11 21:17:27 +00:00
|
|
|
% for now we have only the edges, now calculate mesh lines in between
|
2016-09-05 06:19:19 +00:00
|
|
|
mesh = SmoothMesh(mesh, fineResolution);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% add the outer boundary
|
|
|
|
mesh.x = [mesh.x -60, 60];
|
|
|
|
mesh.y = [mesh.y, -60, 65];
|
|
|
|
mesh.z = [mesh.z, -46, 45];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% add coarse mesh lines for the free space
|
|
|
|
mesh = SmoothMesh(mesh, coarseResolution);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% define the grid
|
|
|
|
CSX = DefineRectGrid( CSX, unit, mesh);
|
|
|
|
% and the feeding port
|
|
|
|
[CSX, port] = AddLumpedPort( CSX, 999, 1, 50, [-1.15, meshline.y(2), -substrate.height], [1.15, meshline.y(2), 0], [0 0 1], true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%setup a NF2FF box for the calculation of the far field
|
|
|
|
start = [mesh.x(10) mesh.y(10) mesh.z(10)];
|
|
|
|
stop = [mesh.x(end-9) mesh.y(end-9) mesh.z(end-9)];
|
|
|
|
[CSX nf2ff] = CreateNF2FFBox(CSX, 'nf2ff', start, stop);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% initialize the FDTD structure with excitation and open boundary conditions
|
|
|
|
FDTD = InitFDTD( 'NrTs', 30000, 'EndCriteria', 1e-5, 'OverSampling', 20);
|
|
|
|
FDTD = SetGaussExcite(FDTD, f_0, f_c );
|
|
|
|
BC = {'PML_8' 'PML_8' 'PML_8' 'PML_8' 'PML_8' 'PML_8'};
|
|
|
|
FDTD = SetBoundaryCond(FDTD, BC );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% remove old data, show structure, calculate new data
|
|
|
|
[status, message, messageid] = rmdir( Sim_Path, 's' ); % clear previous directory
|
|
|
|
[status, message, messageid] = mkdir( Sim_Path ); % create empty simulation folder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% write the data to the working directory
|
|
|
|
WriteOpenEMS([Sim_Path '/' Sim_CSX], FDTD, CSX);
|
|
|
|
% show the geometry for checking
|
|
|
|
CSXGeomPlot([Sim_Path '/' Sim_CSX]);
|
|
|
|
% run the simulation
|
|
|
|
RunOpenEMS( Sim_Path, Sim_CSX);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% plot amplitude and phase of the reflection coefficient
|
|
|
|
freq = linspace(f_0-f_c, f_0+f_c, 200);
|
|
|
|
port = calcPort(port, Sim_Path, freq);
|
|
|
|
s11 = port.uf.ref ./ port.uf.inc;
|
|
|
|
s11phase = unwrap(arg(s11));
|
|
|
|
figure %("visible", "off"); % use this to plot only into files at the end of this script
|
|
|
|
ax = plotyy( freq/1e6, 20*log10(abs(s11)), freq/1e6, s11phase);
|
|
|
|
grid on
|
|
|
|
title( ['reflection coefficient ', suffix, ' S_{11}']);
|
|
|
|
xlabel( 'frequency f / MHz' );
|
|
|
|
ylabel( ax(1), 'reflection coefficient |S_{11}|' );
|
|
|
|
ylabel(ax(2), 'S_{11} phase (rad)');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% define an azimuthal trace around the monopole
|
|
|
|
phi = [0] * pi / 180;
|
|
|
|
theta = [-180:10:180] * pi / 180;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% calculate the delay, the fidelity and the farfield
|
|
|
|
[delay, fidelity, nf2ff] = DelayFidelity(nf2ff, port, Sim_Path, sin(tilt), cos(tilt), theta, phi, f_0, f_c, 'Mode', 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%plot the gain at (close to) f_0
|
|
|
|
f_0_nearest_ind = nthargout(2, @min, abs(nf2ff.freq -f_0));
|
|
|
|
%turn directivity into gain
|
|
|
|
nf2ff.Dmax(f_0_nearest_ind) *= nf2ff.Prad(f_0_nearest_ind) / calcPort(port, Sim_Path, nf2ff.freq(f_0_nearest_ind)).P_inc;
|
|
|
|
figure %("visible", "off");
|
|
|
|
polarFF(nf2ff, 'xaxis', 'theta', 'freq_index', f_0_nearest_ind, 'logscale', [-4, 4]);
|
|
|
|
title(["gain ", suffix, " / dBi"]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% We trick polarFF into plotting the delay in mm because
|
|
|
|
% the axes of the vanilla polar plot can not be scaled.
|
|
|
|
plotvar = delay * C0 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
maxplot = 80;
|
|
|
|
minplot = 30;
|
|
|
|
nf2ff.Dmax(1) = 10^(max(plotvar)/10);
|
|
|
|
nf2ff.E_norm{1} = 10.^(plotvar/20);
|
|
|
|
figure %("visible", "off");
|
|
|
|
polarFF(nf2ff, 'xaxis', 'theta', 'logscale', [minplot, maxplot]);
|
|
|
|
title(["delay ", suffix, " / mm"]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% The same for the fidelity in percent.
|
|
|
|
plotvar = fidelity * 100;
|
|
|
|
maxplot = 100;
|
|
|
|
minplot = 98;
|
|
|
|
nf2ff.Dmax(1) = 10^(max(plotvar)/10);
|
|
|
|
nf2ff.E_norm{1} = 10.^(plotvar/20);
|
|
|
|
figure %("visible", "off");
|
|
|
|
polarFF(nf2ff, 'xaxis', 'theta', 'logscale', [minplot, maxplot]);
|
|
|
|
title(["fidelity ", suffix, " / %"]);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-11 21:17:27 +00:00
|
|
|
% save the plots in order to compare them after simulating the different channels
|
2016-09-05 06:19:19 +00:00
|
|
|
print(1, ["s11_", suffix, ".png"]);
|
|
|
|
print(2, ["farfield_", suffix, ".png"]);
|
|
|
|
print(3, ["delay_mm_", suffix, ".png"]);
|
|
|
|
print(4, ["fidelity_", suffix, ".png"]);
|
|
|
|
return;
|