The DEGLITCH state of the RX state machine is a workaround for misbehaving
PHYs. It is an internal state and an implementation detail and it does not
really make sense to report through the status interface.
Rework things so that DEGLITCH state is reported as part of the CGS state
on the external status interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Add Qsys IP scripts as well as SDC constraint files for the ADI JESD204
peripherals. This allows them to be instantiated and used on Altera/Intel
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Currently the ILAS memory for the receive register map uses a shift
register with variable tap output for storing the ILAS information. This
maps very efficiently onto the primitives found in Xilinx FPGAs. But there
is no equivalent primitive in Altera FPAGs resulting in increased
utilization from having to implement the structure in pure logic.
Change the ILAS memory so it uses a simple dual port RAM for storing the
data. This has slightly increased utilization on Xilinx platforms (but
still good enough) and highly decreased utilization on Altera platforms.
One side effect of this change is that since the RAM output is synchronous
reading the ILAS memory registers will take one extra clock cycle.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Currently the reset for the link clock domain is generated internally in
the axi_jesd204_{rx,tx} peripheral. The reset is controlled by through the
register map.
Add an additional external reset for link clock domain. The link clock
domain is kept in reset if either the internal reset or the external reset
is asserted.
This for example allows the fabric to keep the domain in reset if the clock
is not yet stable.
The status of the external reset can be queried from the register map.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Name all CDC blocks following the patter i_cdc_${signal_name}. This makes
it clear what is going on.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This partially reverts commit a8ade15173.
Remove the nonsensical Makefile dependencies that got added by accident.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
In this particular case the behaviour is the same with non-blocking and
blocking assignments, but that could change if the code is modified in the
future. To avoid any potentially issue due to this consistently use
non-blocking assignments.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Be more standard compliant and assign names to generate for-blocks. This is
required for Altera/Intel support.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
There are currently two sysref related events. One the sysref captured
event which is generated when an external sysref edge has been observed.
The other is the sysref alignment error event which is generated when a
sysref edge is observed that has a different alignment from previously
observed sysref edges.
Capture those events in the register map. This is useful for error
diagnostic. The events are sticky and write-1-to-clear.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For SYSREF handling there are now three possible modes.
1) Disabled. In this mode the LMFC is generated internally and all external
SYSREF edges are ignored. This mode should be used for subclass 0 when no
external sysref is available.
2) Continuous SYSREF. An external SYSREF signal is required and the LMFC is
aligned to the SYSREF signal. The SYSREF signal is continuously monitored
and if a edge unaligned to the previous edges is detected the LMFC is
re-aligned to the new edge.
3) Oneshot SYSREF. Oneshot SYSREF mode is similar to continuous SYSREF mode
except only the first edge is captured and all further edges are ignored,
re-alignment will not happen.
Both in continuous and oneshot signal at least one external sysref edge is
required before an LMFC is generated. All events that require an LMFC will
be delayed until a SYSREF edge has been captured. This is done to avoid
accidental re-alignment.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The ADI JESD204 link layer cores are a implementation of the JESD204 link
layer. They are responsible for handling the control signals (like SYNC and
SYSREF) and controlling the link state machine as well as performing
per-lane (de-)scrambling and character replacement.
Architecturally the cores are separated into two components.
1) Protocol processing cores (jesd204_rx, jesd204_tx). These cores take
care of the JESD204 protocol handling. They have configuration and status
ports that allows to configure their behaviour and monitor the current
state. The processing cores run entirely in the lane_rate/40 clock domain.
They have a upstream and a downstream port that accept and generate raw PHY
level data and transport level payload data (which is which depends on the
direction of the core).
2) Configuration interface cores (axi_jesd204_rx, axi_jesd204_tx). The
configuration interface cores provide a register map interface that allow
access to the to the configuration and status interfaces of the processing
cores. The configuration cores are responsible for implementing the clock
domain crossing between the lane_rate/40 and register map clock domain.
These new cores are compatible to all ADI converter products using the
JESD204 interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Adrian Costina
Istvan Csomortani
Lars-Peter Clausen
Rejeesh Kutty