A multi-link is a link where multiple converter devices are connected to a
single logic device (FPGA). All links involved in a multi-link are synchronous
and established at the same time. For a RX link this means that the SYNC signal
needs to be propagated from the FPGA to each converter.
Dynamic multi-link support must allow to select to which converter devices on
the multi-link the SYNC signal is propagated too. This is useful when depending
on the usecase profile some converter devices are supposed to be disabled.
Add the cfg_links_disable[0x081] register for multi-link control and
propagate its value to the RX FSM.
Split the register map code into a separate sub-module instead of having it
as part of the top-level axi_dmac.v file.
This makes it easier to component test the register map behavior
independently from the DMA transfer logic.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
In DUAL mode half of the data ports are unused and the unused inputs need
to be connected to dummy signals.
Completely hide the unused ports in DUAL mode to remove that requirement.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When the axi_ad9144 core is configured for DUAL mode two of the four
channels are unused. But there is still some residual logic left for those
unused channels that can't be removed by the optimizer.
Completely disable the unused channels by reducing the channel and lane
count. This slightly reduces utilization.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9152 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface DAC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9144 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface DAC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For most of the DACs that use JESD204 as the data transport the digital
interface is very similar. They are mainly differentiated by number of
JESD204 lanes, number of converter channels and number of bits per sample.
Currently for each supported converter there exists a converter specific
core which has the converter specific requirements hard-coded.
Introduce a new generic core that has the number of lanes, number of
channels and bits per sample as synthesis-time configurable parameters. It
can be used as a drop-in replacement for the existing converter specific
cores.
This has the advantage of a shared and reduced code base. Code improvements
will automatically be available for all converters and don't have to be
manually ported to each core individually.
It also makes it very easy to introduce support for new converters that
follow the existing schema.
Since the JESD204 framer is now procedurally generated it is also very
easy to support board or application specific requirements where the lane
to converter ratio differs from the default (E.g. use 2 lanes/2 converters
instead of 4 lanes/2 converters).
This new core is primarily based on the existing axi_ad9144.
For the time being the core is not user instantiatable and will only be
used as a based to re-implement the converter specific cores. It will be
extended in the future to allow user instantiation.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9680 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface ADC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9250 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface ADC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent, except that
the converter clock ratio is now correctly reported as 2 rather than 1 as
before.
Also the adc_rst output port is removed. It is not used in any design. The
current guidelines for the reset for the JESD204 subsystem is to use an
external reset generator.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad6676 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface ADC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent, except that
the converter clock ratio is now correctly reported as 2 rather than 1 as
before.
Also the adc_rst output port is removed. It is not used in any design. The
current guidelines for the reset for the JESD204 subsystem is to use an
external reset generator.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For most of the ADCs that use JESD204 as the data transport the digitial
interface is very similar. They are mainly differentiated by number of
JESD204 lanes, number of converter channels and number of bits per sample.
Currently for each supported converter there exists a converter specific
core which has the converter specific requirements hard-coded.
Introduce a new generic core that has the number of lanes, number of
channels and bits per sample as synthesis-time configurable parameters. It
can be used as a drop-in replacement for the existing converter specific
cores.
This has the advantage of a shared and reduced code base. Code improvements
will automatically be available for all converters and don't have to be
manually ported to each core individually.
It also makes it very easy to introduce support for new converters that
follow the existing schema.
Since the JESD204 deframer is now procedurally generated it is also very
easy to support board or application specific requirements where the lane
to converter ratio differs from the default (E.g. use 2 lanes/2 converters
instead of 4 lanes/2 converters).
This new core is primarily based on the existing axi_ad9680.
For the time being the core is not user instantiatable and will only be
used as a based to re-implement the converter specific cores. It will be
extended in the future to allow user instantiation.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The ADC DMA will never underflow and unsurprisingly the adc_dunf signal is
never used anywhere. It is very unlikely it will ever be used, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The DAC DMA will never overflow and unsurprisingly the dac_dovf signal is
never used anywhere. It is very unlikely it will ever be used, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some designs choose to swap the positive and negative side of the of the
JESD204 lanes. One reason for this would be because it can simplify the
PCB layout. The polarity is in most cases also only applied to a subset of
the used lanes.
Add support for this to the util_adxcvr module. This done by adding new
parameter to the modules that allows to specify a per lane polarity
inversion. Each bit in the parameter corresponds to one lane. If the bit is
set the polarity is inverted for his lane. E.g. setting the parameter to
0xc will invert the 3rd and 4th lane.
The setting is forwarded to the Xilinx transceiver for the corresponding
lane.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some designs choose to swap the positive and negative side of the of the
JESD204 lanes. One reason for this would be because it can simplify the
PCB layout. The polarity is in most cases also only applied to a subset of
the used lanes.
Add support for this to the adi_jesd204 and jesd204_phy for Altera modules.
This done by adding new parameter to the modules that allows to specify a
per lane polarity inversion. Each bit in the parameter corresponds to one
lane. If the bit is set the polarity is inverted for his lane. E.g. setting
the parameter to 0xc will invert the 3rd and 4th lane.
The setting is forwarded depending on whether soft or hard PCS is used to
either the soft PCS module or the transceiver block itself.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Add a parameter to the soft_pcs_loopback_tb that allows to test whether the
soft PCS modules work correctly when the lane polarity is inverted.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some designs choose to swap the positive and negative side of the of the
JESD204 lanes. One reason for this would be because it can simplify the
PCB layout.
To support this add a parameter to the jesd204_soft_pcs_tx module that
allows to specify whether the lane polarity is inverted or not.
The way the polarity inversion is implemented is for free since it just
inverts the output mapping of the 8b10b encoder LUT tables.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some designs choose to swap the positive and negative side of the of the
JESD204 lanes. One reason for this would be because it can simplify the
PCB layout.
To support this add a parameter to the jesd204_soft_pcs_rx module that
allows to specify whether the lane polarity is inverted or not.
The way the polarity inversion is implemented it is for free since it will
only invert the input mapping of the 8b10b decoder LUT tables.
The pattern align module does not care whether the polarity is inverted or
not since the pattern align symbols look the same in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When the source and destination bus widths don't match a resize block is
inserted on the side of the narrower bus. This resize block can contain
partial data.
To ensure that there is no residual partial data is left in the resize
block after a transfer shutdown the resize block is reset when the DMA is
disabled.
Currently this is implemented by tying the reset signal of the resize block
to the enable signal of the DMA. This enable signal is only a indicator
though that the DMA should shutdown. For a proper shutdown outstanding
transactions still need to be completed.
The data that is in the resize block might be required to complete those
transactions. So performing the reset when the enable signal goes low can
lead to a situation where the DMA tries to complete a transaction but can't
do it because the data required to do so has been erased by resetting the
resize block. This leads to a dead lock and the system has to be rebooted
to recover from it.
To solve this use the sync_id signal to reset the resize block. The sync_id
signal will only be asserted when both the destination and source side
module have indicated that they are ready to be reset and there are no more
pending transactions.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The MAX_BYTES_PER_BURST option allows to configure the maximum bytes that
are part of a burst. This can be an arbitrary value.
At the same time there is a limit of how many bytes can be supported by the
memory buses. A AXI3 interface supports a maximum of 16 beats per burst
and a AXI4 interface supports a maximum of 256 beats per burst.
At the moment the it is possible to specify a MAX_BYTES_PER_BURST value
that exceeds what can be supported by the AXI memory-mapped bus. If that is
the case undefined behavior will occur and the DMAC will function
incorrectly.
To avoid this make sure that the MAX_BYTES_PER_BURST value does not exceed
the maximum that can be supported by the interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The width of the AXI burst length field depends on the AXI standard
version. For AXI3 the width is 4 bits allowing a maximum burst length of 16
beats, for AXI4 it is 8 bits wide allowing a maximum burst length of 256
beats.
At the moment the width of the length signals are determined by type of the
source AXI interface, even if the source interface type is not AXI. This
means if the source interface is set to AXI3 and the destination interface
is set to AXI4 the internal width of the signal for all interfaces will be
4 bits. This leads to a truncation of the destination bus length field,
which is supposed to be 8 bits.
If burst are generated that are longer than 16 beats the upper bits of the
length signal will be truncated. The result of this will be that the
external AXI slave interface (e.g. the DDR memory) and the internal logic
in the DMA disagree about burst length. The DMA will eventually lock up
when its internal buffers are full.
To avoid this issue have different configuration parameters for the source
and destination interface that configure the AXI bus length field width.
This way one of the interfaces can be configured for AXI3 and the other for
AXI4 without interfering with each other.
Fixes: commit 495d2f3056 ("axi_dmac: Propagate awlen/arlen width through the core")
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This commit fixes the following warning from the IP packaging flow:
"[IP_Flow 19-801] The last file in file group "Synthesis" should be an HDL file:
"axi_dmac_constr.ttcl". During generation the IP Flow uses the last file to
determine library and other information when generating the top wrapper file.
If possible, please make sure that non-HDL files are located earlier in the list
of files for this file group."
Having the ttcl or other non HDL file at the end of the file group causes issues
when the project preferred language is set to VHDL. Since the synthesis file group
is set to "xilinx_anylanguagesynthesis" the tool tries to guess the type of wrapper
to be generated for that IP based on the last file from the file group.
If the file is non HDL then he defaults to the preferred language (this case VHDL)
Due some issue when the tool tries to create a VHDL wrapper for an IP that has
a Verilog top file with boolean parameters set from the IP packager he fails.
After we reorder the files after each non HDL file addition
he will create a correct Verilog wrapper for it with all parameters
which can be integrated in a VHDL system top file without issues.
Fixes the following warning:
[BD 41-1731] Type mismatch between connected pins: /util_fmcomms11_xcvr/tx_out_clk_0(clk) and /axi_ad9162_core/tx_clk(undef)
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When the DMAC is used in async clock domains the data FIFO instantiate
an ad_mem component to handle properly the clock crossing.
For Intel, this mode is used only in FMCJESDADC1 designs but without this
an error could appear in other projects too if the user reconfigures the core.
The set_false_path constraint targeted to the *ram* cells of the dmac
matched several intra clock domain paths where the timing analysis got
ignored resulting in intermitent data integrity issues.
Exposed AXI3 interface on the Intel version of the IP for UI and feature consistency.
Some of the signals that are defined as optional in the AMBA standard
are marked as mandatory in Qsys in case of AXI3. Because of this such signals
were added to the interface of the DMAC and driven with default values.
For Xilinx in order to keep existing behavior the newly added signals
are hidden from the interface.
New parameters are added to define the width of the AXI transaction IDs;
these are hidden from the UI; We can add them to the UI if the fixed size
of the IDs will cause port incompatibility issues.
Connect the DAC data underflow pin (fifo_rd_underflow) of the DMA
to the dunf pin of the device core. This way the software can detect
underflows in the DAC data path.
Connect the DAC data underflow pin (fifo_rd_underflow) of the DMA
to the dunf pin of the device core. This way the software can detect
underflows in the DAC data path.
Connect the DAC data underflow pin (fifo_rd_underflow) of the DMA
to the dunf pin of the device core. This way the software can detect
underflows in the DAC data path.
Istvan Csomortani
Laszlo Nagy
Lars-Peter Clausen
Adrian Costina