+ Define two control signal for util_tdd_sync : tdd_sync_en and tdd_terminal_type
+ Delete to old ad_tdd_sync.v instances from the core
+ Update Make files
+ Update ad_tdd_control: add additional CDC logic for tdd_sync (the sync comes from another clock domain)
+ Update the ad_tdd_sync module: it's just a simple pulse generator, the pulse period is defined using a parameter, pulse width is fixed: 128 x clock cycle
+ Update TDD regmap: tdd sync period is no longer software defined
The synchronization interface is a single bidirectional line. Output for Master, input for Slave.
The sync_period value is relative to frame length and the digital interface clock. The actual synchronization
period will be: sync_period * frame_length * fb_clock_cycle
This line controls the mux, which switch between hdl and software (GPIO) control of the ENABLE/TXNRX pins.
Fix the broken path and change the name from "tdd_enable" to "tdd_enabled".
Supported carrier are ZC706 and RFSOM.
The synchronization pulse is automatically generated by the master terminal, when TDD mode is enabled.
By default a terminal is slave, software must write 0x01 into TDD register 0x50.
Add tdd_gated_[tx/rx]_dmapath control bits to the TDD logic. With these control line, the user can choose between gated and free-running (like in FDD mode) data flow control.
Add .gitattributes file which sets up the eol encoding handling. This will
make sure that we get a uniform eol encoding across different operating
systems.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
In FDD mode the tx_valid_* signals are generated inside the axi_ad9361_tx module, in function of
the selected dac data rate. In TDD mode, these signals are gated by the tdd_enable and tdd_tx_dp_en signals.
In other words, the tx_valid_* signals will be valid just when tdd_enable and tdd_tx_dp_en is active.
By setting the AXI controler interface type from axi4 to axi4lite we can use
the normal toplevel file with only a simple modification to add the awprot
and arprot signals.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This is unused and unneeded. The AXI interconnect will make sure that a
peripheral only gets requests that are meant for it, there is no need to
check the address in the peripheral itself.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Istvan Csomortani
Rejeesh Kutty
Lars-Peter Clausen
Adrian Costina
ATofan