Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fornero <matt.fornero@mathworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fornero <matt.fornero@mathworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Use the new util_cpack2 and util_upack2 cores. They have lower utilization
that the old util_cpack and util_upack cores.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When we improve timing by modifying the implementation strategies,
the general rule of thumb is "less is always more".
Timing did not fail in synthesis, so we leaving the synthesis
strategy in default.
After several parallel runs with various strategies, the
"Performance_Explore" strategy gave the best result for
implementation.
Each individual link of a multi-link has its own sync signal. The top level
sync port that is created by the ad_xcvrcon function is always a single bit
single though.
This results in only the sync signal of the first link being routed while
others are ignored.
To fix this make sure that for multi-link setups the sync port is a vector
port with the width equal to the number of links.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
- refclk and refclk_rst were used for ethernet IDELAY, but are not needed anymore
- muxaddr_out pins overlap with regular GPIOs in the Zed base design. The XADC mux GPIOs can be controlled through that. Cusomters that want to directly control the pins through XADC IP must modify the design
In default strategy we having a few path with small negative slack inside of
the MIG, due to the high UI clock (300MHz).
This new strategy solves this issue.
Lars-Peter Clausen
Matt Fornero
Adrian Costina
Istvan Csomortani
Laszlo Nagy
AndreiGrozav