A larger store-and-forward memory provides better protection against worst
case memory interface latencies by being able to store more data before
over-/underflowing.
Based on empirical testing it was found that using a size of 4 bursts can
still result in underflows/overflows under certain conditions. These do not
happen when using a size of 8 bursts.
This change does not significantly increase resource consumption. Both on
Intel and Xilinx the block RAM has a minimum depth of 512 entries. With a
default burst length of 16 beats that allows for up to 32 bursts without
requiring additional block RAM.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The label for the store-and-forward memory size configuration option at the
moment is just "FIFO Size" and while the store-and-forward memory uses a
FIFO that is just a implementation detail.
Change the label to "Store-and-Forward Memory Size". This is more
descriptive as it references the function not the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For correct operation the store-and-forward memory size must be a
power-of-two in the range of 2 to 32.
This is simple enough so we can list all values and let the IP Integrator
and QSYS perform proper validation of the parameter.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
This comment hasn't been true in a long long time. It does not have any
relation to the code around it anymore.
So just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
In the system top of the FMCOMMS5 projects, there are several GPIO lines, which
can not find in the constraint file, respectively gpio_open_15_15,
gpio_open_44_44 and gpio_45_45.
These are floating GPIO pins, as their names suggest. Delete all these wires and
update IOBUF instances.
Moved XCVR related connections to HP0, where the HP shares the MUX with the Video DMA
HP1 and HP2 are used for RX OS and RX DMAs, sharing the MUX. Usually they shouldn't run at the same time.
HP3 is used for TX DMA, sharing the MUX with the FPD DMA controller
All HPx and DMA buswidths have been increased to 128 bits
The HPx-DMA clock has been increased to 300 MHz
DAC FIFO address size has been increased to 17
* jesd204: Add RX error statistics
Added 32 bit error counter per lane, register 0x308 + lane*0x20
On the control part added register 0x244 for performing counter reset and counter mask
Bit 0 resets the counter when set to 1
Bit 8 masks the disparity errors, when set to 1
Bit 9 masks the not in table errors when set to 1
Bit 10 masks the unexpected k errors, when set to 1
Unexpected K errors are counted when a character other than k28 is detected. The counter doesn't add errors when in CGS phase
Incremented version number
Commit e6aacd2f56 ("axi_dmac: Better support debug IDs when ID_WIDTH !=
3") managed to get the order of the IDs in the debug register wrong.
Restore the original order.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The cfg_links_disable register will mask the SYNC lines, disabled links
will always have a de-asserted SYNC (logic state HIGH).
The FSM will stay in CGS as long as there is one active link with an
asserted SYNC (logic state LOW).
Update the test bench to generate the SYNC signals in different clock
edges, so it can test all the possible scenarios.
A multi-link is a link where multiple converter devices are connected to a
single logic device (FPGA). All links involved in a multi-link are synchronous
and established at the same time. For a TX link this means that the FPGA receives
multiple SYNC signals, one for each link. The state machine of the TX link
peripheral must combine those SYNC signals into a single SYNC signal that is
asserted when either of the external SYNC signals is asserted.
Dynamic multi-link support must allow to select to which converter devices on
the multi-link the SYNC signal is propagated too. This is useful when depending
on the use case profile some converter devices are supposed to be disabled.
Add the cfg_links_disable[0x081] register for multi-link control and
propagate its value to the TX FSM.
A multi-link is a link where multiple converter devices are connected to a
single logic device (FPGA). All links involved in a multi-link are synchronous
and established at the same time. For a RX link this means that the SYNC signal
needs to be propagated from the FPGA to each converter.
Dynamic multi-link support must allow to select to which converter devices on
the multi-link the SYNC signal is propagated too. This is useful when depending
on the usecase profile some converter devices are supposed to be disabled.
Add the cfg_links_disable[0x081] register for multi-link control and
propagate its value to the RX FSM.
Split the register map code into a separate sub-module instead of having it
as part of the top-level axi_dmac.v file.
This makes it easier to component test the register map behavior
independently from the DMA transfer logic.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
In DUAL mode half of the data ports are unused and the unused inputs need
to be connected to dummy signals.
Completely hide the unused ports in DUAL mode to remove that requirement.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
When the axi_ad9144 core is configured for DUAL mode two of the four
channels are unused. But there is still some residual logic left for those
unused channels that can't be removed by the optimizer.
Completely disable the unused channels by reducing the channel and lane
count. This slightly reduces utilization.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9152 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface DAC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9144 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface DAC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For most of the DACs that use JESD204 as the data transport the digital
interface is very similar. They are mainly differentiated by number of
JESD204 lanes, number of converter channels and number of bits per sample.
Currently for each supported converter there exists a converter specific
core which has the converter specific requirements hard-coded.
Introduce a new generic core that has the number of lanes, number of
channels and bits per sample as synthesis-time configurable parameters. It
can be used as a drop-in replacement for the existing converter specific
cores.
This has the advantage of a shared and reduced code base. Code improvements
will automatically be available for all converters and don't have to be
manually ported to each core individually.
It also makes it very easy to introduce support for new converters that
follow the existing schema.
Since the JESD204 framer is now procedurally generated it is also very
easy to support board or application specific requirements where the lane
to converter ratio differs from the default (E.g. use 2 lanes/2 converters
instead of 4 lanes/2 converters).
This new core is primarily based on the existing axi_ad9144.
For the time being the core is not user instantiatable and will only be
used as a based to re-implement the converter specific cores. It will be
extended in the future to allow user instantiation.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9680 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface ADC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad9250 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface ADC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent, except that
the converter clock ratio is now correctly reported as 2 rather than 1 as
before.
Also the adc_rst output port is removed. It is not used in any design. The
current guidelines for the reset for the JESD204 subsystem is to use an
external reset generator.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Replace the axi_ad6676 implementation with the new generic JESD204
interface ADC core. The replacement is functionally equivalent, except that
the converter clock ratio is now correctly reported as 2 rather than 1 as
before.
Also the adc_rst output port is removed. It is not used in any design. The
current guidelines for the reset for the JESD204 subsystem is to use an
external reset generator.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
For most of the ADCs that use JESD204 as the data transport the digitial
interface is very similar. They are mainly differentiated by number of
JESD204 lanes, number of converter channels and number of bits per sample.
Currently for each supported converter there exists a converter specific
core which has the converter specific requirements hard-coded.
Introduce a new generic core that has the number of lanes, number of
channels and bits per sample as synthesis-time configurable parameters. It
can be used as a drop-in replacement for the existing converter specific
cores.
This has the advantage of a shared and reduced code base. Code improvements
will automatically be available for all converters and don't have to be
manually ported to each core individually.
It also makes it very easy to introduce support for new converters that
follow the existing schema.
Since the JESD204 deframer is now procedurally generated it is also very
easy to support board or application specific requirements where the lane
to converter ratio differs from the default (E.g. use 2 lanes/2 converters
instead of 4 lanes/2 converters).
This new core is primarily based on the existing axi_ad9680.
For the time being the core is not user instantiatable and will only be
used as a based to re-implement the converter specific cores. It will be
extended in the future to allow user instantiation.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The ADC DMA will never underflow and unsurprisingly the adc_dunf signal is
never used anywhere. It is very unlikely it will ever be used, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
The DAC DMA will never overflow and unsurprisingly the dac_dovf signal is
never used anywhere. It is very unlikely it will ever be used, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some designs choose to swap the positive and negative side of the of the
JESD204 lanes. One reason for this would be because it can simplify the
PCB layout. The polarity is in most cases also only applied to a subset of
the used lanes.
Add support for this to the util_adxcvr module. This done by adding new
parameter to the modules that allows to specify a per lane polarity
inversion. Each bit in the parameter corresponds to one lane. If the bit is
set the polarity is inverted for his lane. E.g. setting the parameter to
0xc will invert the 3rd and 4th lane.
The setting is forwarded to the Xilinx transceiver for the corresponding
lane.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Some designs choose to swap the positive and negative side of the of the
JESD204 lanes. One reason for this would be because it can simplify the
PCB layout. The polarity is in most cases also only applied to a subset of
the used lanes.
Add support for this to the adi_jesd204 and jesd204_phy for Altera modules.
This done by adding new parameter to the modules that allows to specify a
per lane polarity inversion. Each bit in the parameter corresponds to one
lane. If the bit is set the polarity is inverted for his lane. E.g. setting
the parameter to 0xc will invert the 3rd and 4th lane.
The setting is forwarded depending on whether soft or hard PCS is used to
either the soft PCS module or the transceiver block itself.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Add a parameter to the soft_pcs_loopback_tb that allows to test whether the
soft PCS modules work correctly when the lane polarity is inverted.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Lars-Peter Clausen
Laszlo Nagy
Istvan Csomortani
Adrian Costina